Review



numerical electromagnetic simulation comsol multiphysics version 6.0  (COMSOL Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    COMSOL Inc numerical electromagnetic simulation comsol multiphysics version 6.0
    A ) e-GLUE’s adhesion strength on gastric mucosal tissue in vivo under various electrical stimulation conditions. B ) Maximum temperature of local gastric tissue under various electrical stimulation conditions. The temperature was measured using an IR camera during terminal experiments where the pig was under anesthesia. C ) IR images illustrating temperature distribution on the mucosal tissue before (0 s) and after (80 s) electrical stimulation treatment at a voltage amplitude of 10 V. D ) Maximum temperature of local mucosal tissue over 80 s. E ) Representative histological images of gastric mucosal tissues before and after electrical stimulation (E+) under optimal conditions (10 V, 80 s). Dashed rectangles indicate the regions around the e-GLUE’s perimeter. F ) 3D electromagnetic-bioheat transfer simulations using COMSOL <t>Multiphysics</t> (version 6.0) to visualize spatial-temporal temperature distribution in the hydrogel-tissue coupling structure in the depth direction over 80 s. The voltage amplitude in Fig. C, D , and F was set at 10 V. Values in panels A, B , and D represent the mean and the standard deviation (n = 3-4).
    Numerical Electromagnetic Simulation Comsol Multiphysics Version 6.0, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/numerical+electromagnetic+simulation+comsol+multiphysics+version+6%2E0/bio_rxiv__2023__12__19__572448-56-7-7?v=COMSOL+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    numerical electromagnetic simulation comsol multiphysics version 6.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Electroadhesive hydrogel interface for prolonged mucosal theranostics"

    Article Title: Electroadhesive hydrogel interface for prolonged mucosal theranostics

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2023.12.19.572448

    A ) e-GLUE’s adhesion strength on gastric mucosal tissue in vivo under various electrical stimulation conditions. B ) Maximum temperature of local gastric tissue under various electrical stimulation conditions. The temperature was measured using an IR camera during terminal experiments where the pig was under anesthesia. C ) IR images illustrating temperature distribution on the mucosal tissue before (0 s) and after (80 s) electrical stimulation treatment at a voltage amplitude of 10 V. D ) Maximum temperature of local mucosal tissue over 80 s. E ) Representative histological images of gastric mucosal tissues before and after electrical stimulation (E+) under optimal conditions (10 V, 80 s). Dashed rectangles indicate the regions around the e-GLUE’s perimeter. F ) 3D electromagnetic-bioheat transfer simulations using COMSOL Multiphysics (version 6.0) to visualize spatial-temporal temperature distribution in the hydrogel-tissue coupling structure in the depth direction over 80 s. The voltage amplitude in Fig. C, D , and F was set at 10 V. Values in panels A, B , and D represent the mean and the standard deviation (n = 3-4).
    Figure Legend Snippet: A ) e-GLUE’s adhesion strength on gastric mucosal tissue in vivo under various electrical stimulation conditions. B ) Maximum temperature of local gastric tissue under various electrical stimulation conditions. The temperature was measured using an IR camera during terminal experiments where the pig was under anesthesia. C ) IR images illustrating temperature distribution on the mucosal tissue before (0 s) and after (80 s) electrical stimulation treatment at a voltage amplitude of 10 V. D ) Maximum temperature of local mucosal tissue over 80 s. E ) Representative histological images of gastric mucosal tissues before and after electrical stimulation (E+) under optimal conditions (10 V, 80 s). Dashed rectangles indicate the regions around the e-GLUE’s perimeter. F ) 3D electromagnetic-bioheat transfer simulations using COMSOL Multiphysics (version 6.0) to visualize spatial-temporal temperature distribution in the hydrogel-tissue coupling structure in the depth direction over 80 s. The voltage amplitude in Fig. C, D , and F was set at 10 V. Values in panels A, B , and D represent the mean and the standard deviation (n = 3-4).

    Techniques Used: In Vivo, Standard Deviation



    Similar Products

    numerical electromagnetic simulation comsol multiphysics version 6.0  (COMSOL Inc)
    90
    COMSOL Inc numerical electromagnetic simulation comsol multiphysics version 6.0
    A ) e-GLUE’s adhesion strength on gastric mucosal tissue in vivo under various electrical stimulation conditions. B ) Maximum temperature of local gastric tissue under various electrical stimulation conditions. The temperature was measured using an IR camera during terminal experiments where the pig was under anesthesia. C ) IR images illustrating temperature distribution on the mucosal tissue before (0 s) and after (80 s) electrical stimulation treatment at a voltage amplitude of 10 V. D ) Maximum temperature of local mucosal tissue over 80 s. E ) Representative histological images of gastric mucosal tissues before and after electrical stimulation (E+) under optimal conditions (10 V, 80 s). Dashed rectangles indicate the regions around the e-GLUE’s perimeter. F ) 3D electromagnetic-bioheat transfer simulations using COMSOL <t>Multiphysics</t> (version 6.0) to visualize spatial-temporal temperature distribution in the hydrogel-tissue coupling structure in the depth direction over 80 s. The voltage amplitude in Fig. C, D , and F was set at 10 V. Values in panels A, B , and D represent the mean and the standard deviation (n = 3-4).
    Numerical Electromagnetic Simulation Comsol Multiphysics Version 6.0, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/numerical+electromagnetic+simulation+comsol+multiphysics+version+6%2E0/bio_rxiv__2023__12__19__572448-56-7-7?v=COMSOL+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    numerical electromagnetic simulation comsol multiphysics version 6.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    A ) e-GLUE’s adhesion strength on gastric mucosal tissue in vivo under various electrical stimulation conditions. B ) Maximum temperature of local gastric tissue under various electrical stimulation conditions. The temperature was measured using an IR camera during terminal experiments where the pig was under anesthesia. C ) IR images illustrating temperature distribution on the mucosal tissue before (0 s) and after (80 s) electrical stimulation treatment at a voltage amplitude of 10 V. D ) Maximum temperature of local mucosal tissue over 80 s. E ) Representative histological images of gastric mucosal tissues before and after electrical stimulation (E+) under optimal conditions (10 V, 80 s). Dashed rectangles indicate the regions around the e-GLUE’s perimeter. F ) 3D electromagnetic-bioheat transfer simulations using COMSOL Multiphysics (version 6.0) to visualize spatial-temporal temperature distribution in the hydrogel-tissue coupling structure in the depth direction over 80 s. The voltage amplitude in Fig. C, D , and F was set at 10 V. Values in panels A, B , and D represent the mean and the standard deviation (n = 3-4).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Electroadhesive hydrogel interface for prolonged mucosal theranostics

    doi: 10.1101/2023.12.19.572448

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A ) e-GLUE’s adhesion strength on gastric mucosal tissue in vivo under various electrical stimulation conditions. B ) Maximum temperature of local gastric tissue under various electrical stimulation conditions. The temperature was measured using an IR camera during terminal experiments where the pig was under anesthesia. C ) IR images illustrating temperature distribution on the mucosal tissue before (0 s) and after (80 s) electrical stimulation treatment at a voltage amplitude of 10 V. D ) Maximum temperature of local mucosal tissue over 80 s. E ) Representative histological images of gastric mucosal tissues before and after electrical stimulation (E+) under optimal conditions (10 V, 80 s). Dashed rectangles indicate the regions around the e-GLUE’s perimeter. F ) 3D electromagnetic-bioheat transfer simulations using COMSOL Multiphysics (version 6.0) to visualize spatial-temporal temperature distribution in the hydrogel-tissue coupling structure in the depth direction over 80 s. The voltage amplitude in Fig. C, D , and F was set at 10 V. Values in panels A, B , and D represent the mean and the standard deviation (n = 3-4).

    Article Snippet: We developed a numerical electromagnetic simulation using COMSOL Multiphysics (version 6.0, Extended text) to visualize the electrical field distribution with different electrode shapes ( , fig. S9 ).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Standard Deviation